Lupine Publishers| Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Abstract
Methods: An individual questionnaire was applied by physicians to cadet and junior athletes that competed in international judo tournaments in 2014. Statistical inferential analysis was performed to identify the major injury risk factors and injury patterns in these ages.
Results: 212 athletes from 13 different countries (53% portuguese) answered the questionnaire. Male predominance was found, and a mean age of 16,8 ±1,5 years with 9,7±3,1years of judo practice. We found 347 injuries, with 83% of the athletes reporting at least one injury. The majority of injuries occurred to the limbs (85%) during training period (71%), in the throwing phase (87,6%), as a consequence of direct contact (72%) and with articular involvement (62%). Sprain was the most common type (36%) and shoulder the most specific segment affected (25%) with an occurrence twice as high during defense movements [p=0,018]. Injury occurrence was associated with training load (p=0,001), whilst the number of injuries with the age [p=0,005], need to lose weight (p=0,007) and training load (0,001).
Conclusions: Increasing age, need to lose weight and training load were identified as injury risk factors for these ages. We also verified that shoulder injuries are significantly more frequent during defense movements, being these ones that led to more severe injuries.
Keywords: Judo; Sports injury; Trauma; Young athletes; Martial arts
Introduction
Methods
Results
Demographic data
Some of the preliminary descriptive epidemiological data were published previously in an early phase of the study (Table1 & 2) [10]. Based on the information obtained from the questionnaires, we analyzed the answers of 212 young high competitive judo athletes, from 13 different countries (52% Portuguese). Of these, 118 were cadet and 94 junior with a mean age of 16.8±1.5 years and male predominance (68.4%). The more common weight categories were -60, -66e -73Kg in male gender and -57, -63 and -70Kg in female gender. We found that 205 athletes compete in categories with weight limit and that 127 (62%) have a real weight higher than that of their category. Most of the athletes were black belt (55.6%) and assume a right-handed dominance grip position (73.1%) while performing judo techniques. We verified that athletes with higher rank were the ones who did more judo trainings sessions per week (Rho=0.254, p<0.001), and hours per day [Rho=0.313, p<0.001] and per week (Rho=0.338, p<0.001). The average number of years of judo practice was 9.7±3, 1 (1-16), the number of judo training sessions per week 5.5±1.9 (2-11) and hours per day 2.57±0.9 (1-6). All athletes reported having warm up sessions prior to judo training, averaging 23.3min±8.8 [10-60], while 12.7% answered that they do not usually stretch after activity. Around 65% of the athletes do gym sessions and strength workouts averaging 2.83 sessions per week. Out of these, 24.1% perform 4 or more gym sessions per week. We found a statistically significant correlation between the age of the athlete and hours of training per day (Rho=0.244, p<0.001) and per week (Rho=0.280, p<0.001). We also verified that the athletes who need to lose weight to compete, were the ones who had more judo trainings per week, judo training hours per day and per week and a higher number of gym sessions/strength workout per week (Table 3). Regarding athletes that do gym sessions, we found a statistically significant correlation with age, need to lose weight and judo training load [number of trainings per week, training hours per day and per week]. Comparing portuguese athletes with foreigners regarding the frequency of gym sessions, we found that foreigner athletes do 3.9 times more this type of workout than the portuguese (x2= 19.578, p<0.001; OR=3.861 [IC95%: 2.088-7.142]) and that the judo training sessions are on average 14 minutes longer than the portuguese ones [p=0.038].
Table 1: Demographic Data: athlete intrinsic characteristics, training method and practice level
M: male. sd: standard deviation
Table 2: Frequency, type, distribution and severity of sports injuries in high-competitive level judoka
sd: standard deviation
Table 3: Statistically significant correlation with the athletes who need to lose weight
*Spearman's correlation
Frequency of injuries
We found 347 injuries in 83% of the athletes, while 17% reported no injuries due to judo practice. The average number of injuries per athlete was 1.64±1.36 (Table 2). We verified a statistically significant correlation between the presence of injury and the number of judo trainings per week [p=0.005] and of judo training weekly hours [p=0.014]. Regarding the number of injuries, this was statistically significant correlated with age, need to lose weight, number of trainings per week and daily and weekly judo training hours (Table 4). We found no statistically correlation between the occurrence of injury and rank, gender, grip dominance, warm up, stretching, gym sessions or years of practice. We have noticed a tendency for injuries in those who do gym sessions but with no statistical significance. We also did not find any statistically significant correlation between the weight category and the number of injuries, frequence by specific anatomical segment and type of injury or its severity. We observed that the presence of injury was related with the age category (x2=8.593, p=0.003) with a probability of injury 3.34 times higher in junior athletes when compared with cadets (OR=3,344 [IC95%: 1,445-7,743]).Action and phase of combat
Most of the injuries (71.2%) occurred during training sessions (62% in the pre-competitive phase] [p<0.001 [IC95%: 0.661-0.759]) and throwing phase (87.6%) (p<0.001, [IC95%: 0.837-0. 909]). The occurrence of injury was similar for both defense (45.8%) and attack (46.1%) movements, and 8,1% of the injuries occurred without any interference of the opponent. However, we observed that the occurrence of shoulder injuries was 1.8 times higher during defense movements (x2=5.629, p=0.018; OR=1.838 IC95%: 1.108-3.050). We verified that of all injuries that occurred during groundwork phase, most (55.8%) occurred during a defense movement of the athlete. We also found that the upper limb injuries were more frequent during groundwork phase (55, 8%) while those in the lower limbs were during standing phase (46, 7%) (Table 5). Even tough we found groundwork injuries more common during trainings regarding its absolute number, these injuries were 2.4 times higher in proportion during competition (x2=7.490, p<0.006;OR=2.435 [IC95%: 1.269-4.670]).
Table 5: Statistically significant differences between
anatomical region, phase of combat, injury type, injury mechanism and
injury severity.
** Chi-square; ¥ Fisher's Test; ß Mann-Whitney's Test
Injury location
Regarding injury location, we found a statistically significant higher number of limb injuries [84,8%], with 40,1% in the upper limb and 44,7% in the lower limb. Out of the rest of injuries reported, 11,2% occur in the axial skeleton and 4% in the head (Table 2). Analyzing all injuries by specific anatomical segment we verified that shoulder was the most commonly involved [n=87, 25.1%] followed by the knee (n=68, 19.6%), ankle (n=37, 10.7%) and spine (n=31, 8.9%). About half of the injuries occurred on the right side of the body, 40% on the left one and 10% on the median region. We verified with statistically significant difference that most of the injuries had an articular involvement (61.7%],[p<0.001, [IC95%: 0.563-0.668]).Mechanism and types of injury
The most common mechanism of injury identified was direct contact [n=249, 71.8%], followed by dynamic overload (n=50, 14.4%) and cyclic overuse (n=48, 13.8%). On the other side, the most common types of injury identified were sprain [36.3%], muscular rupture (17.3%) and contusion [16.1%] (Table 2). Fracture and dislocation occurred with the same frequency (12.7%) and were the ones that had with higher injury severity. Tendinopathy was found in 4.9% of the cases. Regarding the type of injuries, we found with statistical significance, that dislocation and tendinopathy were more common in the upper limb, sprain in the lower limb, muscular rupture in the axial skeleton and contusion in the head (Table 5). We also verified that the probability of muscular rupture occurrence was 2 times higher than any of the other types of injury during competition (x2=5.838, p=0.016;0R=2.020 [IC95%:1. 134-3.597]). Regarding the mechanism of injury, we found, with statistically significant difference, that the occurrence of contusion was 2.4 times more common than any of the other types of injury during training [x2=5.289, p=0.021;OR=2.376 (IC95%: 1.1175.055)]. We also observed with statistically significant differences that upper limb injuries are more frequent as consequence of direct contact and that those of the axis and lower limb as consequence of dynamic overload (Table 5). We noticed that the mechanism of injury was statistically correlated with the type of injury (x2=139,283, p<0,001). We verified that muscular rupture was related with dynamic overload, tendinopathy with cyclic overuse, dislocation, fracture, contusion and sprain with direct contact.Injury severity
Regarding the impact and severity of the injuries, we verified that 81% resulted in cessation of the activity. We also noticed with statistically significant difference, a higher proportion of severe injuries during defense movements and of mild injuries on solo movements (no movement/action from the opponent] [H1=27.109,p=0.014) (Table 6). In 18% of the injuries no treatment was needed, while 72% needed some kind of treatment. About 72% of the treated injuries required elastic contension, functional bandage or immobilization. We also noticed that 56.2% of the injuries required physiotherapy and 6.6% required surgery mainly because of knee pathology (52.2%)-meniscal tear or anterior cruciate ligament rupture. We did not find any statistically significant correlation between injury severity and its occurrence during training or competition, phase of combat, sports season, mechanism of injury or rank. The most severe injuries were joint dislocation and bone fracture and the less severe was muscular rupture (Table 6). We found that the most severe ones were statistically correlated with the number of years of judo practice of the athletes, and we also verified that athletes that perform more judo trainings per week, tend to have more severe injuries, but without statistical significance (r=0.098, p=0.0690). Regarding the severity of the injury, this was found to be correlated with the type of treatment [p=0.007], with some of the most severe ones leading to surgical procedures [p=0.045] and mild injuries to no procedure at all [p=0.003]. Analyzing injury severity between portuguese and foreign athletes we found no differences between both groups. Regarding the anatomical segment, we verified that the most severe injuries occur in the upper limb and the less severe in the head (Table 5).
Table 6: Statistically significant differences between injury severity, action, injury type and years of judo practice.
* Kruskal-Wallis; β Pearson's correlation
Discussion
Demographic data, injury incidence patterns and risk factors
Based on the results collected in our study, we obtained a diverse sample of athletes from different european countries, with a normal distribution regarding age category and nationality [portuguesese versus foreigners], with a predominance for central weight categories similar to the european trend. Considering the need for high technical requisits, specialization and load training intensity in such a young age, these athletes are more likely to develop injuries in their sports activity [2,4,5,11].With respect to the frequency of injuries, we verified that 83% of the athletes had at least one injury, a number that seems clearly underestimated: for example, we didn't find any ear injuries, skin scratches or epistaxis reported in our study, and we noticed a low number of small articular injuries although they are common in judo practice [3,12-15]. The main reason for that is probably related with the socio-psychological profile of judo formers, having higher pain thresholds in relation with the high training intensity. In addition, this also happens due to the demanding competitive calendar and athletes' will of the athletes to pursue their objectives, which makes them train in suboptimal conditions, sometimes hiding injuries, without medical support, reducing quality, intensity and training performance, ultimately leading to chronic injuries or re-injuries [16-19].We verified that 72% of all injuries occur during training period, an outcome that is also described in the literature [16,20]. This is possibly related to poor training strategy programs with excessive intensity and training load in young ages, which predisposes to a high musculoskeletal fragility [13,21,22]. Another reason for this fact is that many athletes undergo strenuous strength workout programs while training hard before competition, all the while maintaining hydric and caloric restriction diets for several days [12,23-27]. This attitude might lead to situations of severe dehydration fluid and electrolyte imbalance which can potentially influence both the physical and psychological performance of the athletes [12,2325,28-30]. It is also important to highlight the weight differences between partners during practices [8], which become even more important in the pre-competitive period, during which most of the athletes are already on a diet at these ages. Because of this, it is important to evaluate some risk/benefits for the athletes, when considering the dynamic balance of upgrading skills by fighting with a heavier and more experienced partner and the potential risk of injury because of it before a competition.
Similar to other studies, we found that most ofthe injuries (74%) occurred during the throwing phase [31]. This is mainly explained because most of the action during a fight occurs in the standing phase, with associated explosive attacking throws and defense resisting movements counteracting the action [32-34]. verified that a greater injury severity was related to defense movements, which is consistent with the literature [31]. We also found that the occurrence of groundwork injuries was 2.4 times higher in competition than in training, which is probably related with higher fight intensity in this phase of combat during competition [31].
In line with the literature, we observed a total of 85% of limb injuries [13,35], 72% of the injuries due to a direct contact mechanism [35-37] and that 62% of all injuries were articular. This articular involvement is mainly explained by the direct contact mechanism but also because most of the action occurs by working in closed kinetic chains, which, because of the strong musculoskeletal structure of the athletes, causes movement fulcrums such as the joints to become more prone to injury [13,16,21,35,38] .Similar to other studies, shoulder was the anatomical segment most commonly affected [19,39] and we observed that its shoulder injury occurrence was 1.8 times higher during defense movements, mainly caused by the resistance of the defender in an attempt not to fall on his back [32-34] .
In our study we verified an 81% of time-loss injuries, result that, as previously stated, seems clearly related to an underestimation of mild injuries by the athletes, that remember more accurately severe injuries, like dislocation or fracture, because of the obvious repercussion in their sports activity and overall daily activity [40]. Despite this limitation in data quality, we can assume that the information collected is very accurate for severe injuries related to judo practice in young athletes. In 72% of the cases, athletes used some kind of elastic or functional bandaging or immobilization, usual practice in judo high level athletes, that do it often in a daily basis practice [41].
Limitations
Conclusion
For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website:
https://lupinepublishers.us/
For more Open Access Orthopedics and Sports medicine articles Please Click Here:
https://lupinepublishers.com/orthopedics-sportsmedicine-journal/
To Know More About Open Access Publishers Please Click on Lupine Publishers
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.