Lupine Publishers | Open Access Journal of Anthropological and Archaeological Sciences
Opinion
Modernity, as we know it, emanated from the twin revolutions of
Europe: Industrial revolution and French revolution. The economic
principles of industrialization and the political principles of French
revolution have been built into the development processes of many
nations. This is particularly true of post-colonial nations, wherein the
principles of the above said modernity have been incorporated into many
of their constitutions. These two, economic modernity of
industrialization and political modernity of equality, liberty and
fraternity have been related processes. Often in developing countries
the first has been inadequate. That is to say the industrial modernity
has never been realized fully in developing countries. The developing
countries of Africa and Asia in particular, to this day, largely remain
pre-industrial. And this has limiting consequences on their political
modernity. The requisite economic basis, by way of industrial modernity
has never come to materialize in order to make way to political
modernity. The political modernity therefore is circumscribed by the
many limitations not only of their variegated historical past but also
by their inadequate industrial development since the decolonization.
Therefore, what one finds in many developing countries is a not an
archetypical modernity of Europe, but different degrees of approximation
to it. The political economy of these countries is still held back by
the unresolved agrarian and rural question. The agrarian pre-modernity,
with all the particularities and backwardness that it carries, colors
the nature of the modernity in developing countries. Industrialization
could not take place in developing countries owing to the policies they
adopted since the decolonization, owing to dependent nature of their
economies and owing to the unequal international political economy.
Thus, these are mutually reinforcing factors that keep many of the
developing countries politically pre-modern. Of all, the main point that
we would like stress here, is the continuation of large populations
in developing countries in agriculture which keeps them tied to backward
productive forces and social relations of production. This keeps the
entire nations beholden to an archaic pre-industrial past. The
breakthrough that the European and other advanced nations have achieved
from agriculture to industry, from rural to urban, from pre-modern to
modern does not happen, or happens only in a very distorted manner in
developing countries of Asia and Africa today. This is after nearly
seven decades of decolonization.
And worse, owing to the globalization and the crises that we have seen
since the 9/11 and wars on terror the question of realizing modernity
has seen a reversal in many countries. There has been an emergence of
cultural aversion to western modernity and going back to native
principles. This has resulted in increasing emergence of backward
looking nationalisms and rightwing governments. This apart, one should
also keep in mind, very starkly indeed, that there is no
de-contextualized modernity anywhere in the world. The modernity in the
developing world can only have the birth marks of the particular society
in which it is born. Therefore though the economic principles of
industrial development and the political principles of liberty, equality
and fraternity appear to be universal principles, their emergence or
development in particular societies will only be imbued with
particularities. This also means the imperfect realization of the
principles. This is true in terms of economic, social and political
institutional processes and their inter sectionalities. Thus, there
cannot be one model of modernity any more. There are different models of
modernity: Asian modernity, African modernity and so on. This may sound
paradoxical, but is inevitable in an imperfect world.
The situation has come to such an impasse that in many parts of the
developing world there are even questions of whether adopting the
principles of (what was European) modernity at all relevant or
meaningful. And there is slide backwards to rely in pre-modern world
views and modes of life. This raises a pertinent question.
Is modernity relevant today? This authors thinks yes, because,
the principles of enlightenment embodied in modernity and the
political principles of liberty, equality and fraternity have been
historically been a step forward to mankind. It is immaterial today
whether these principles are of European or some other origin, their
value on human grounds is immeasurable. And, let us also be aware
of the fact that many reversals that the developing countries are
witnessing today from modernity have the effect of reinforcing the
pre-modern, and primordial inequalities and oppressions. Far from
emancipating the ones who are chained to history, they strengthen
the bondages. Thus, this is more than a rhetorical question as to
how many people will enjoy what kind of liberties, what kind of
egalitarianism and what social and economic opportunities in terms
of industrial modernity. To deny the importance of modernity is to
deny the possibilities of development to a large number of people
caught in pre-modern routines of agriculture, pre-modern social
relations of inequality and oppression and pre-modern institutions
of particularity and irrationality. Today it is important to reaffirm
our faith in the principles of modernity, thereby, on the founding
principles of the polities of the many developing nations of the
world. This is in the face of the many reversals from development
that the humanity is witnessing in this part of the world: Modernity
and its characteristics being the most pre-eminent amongst them.
Read More About Lupine Publishers | Journal of Anthropology and Archaeology Sciences Click on Below Link:
https://journalofanthropologicalsciences.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.