Correlation between Ultrasound Findings of EctopicPregnancy And Operative Findings in Sudanese Women by Hassan A Elkheir in IGWHC in Lupine Publishers.
Implantation of pregnancy outside the normal endometrial
cavity called an ectopic pregnancy, which accounts for about 10% of
all pregnancy-related deaths, despite improved diagnostic methods
leading to earlier detection and effective treatment [1]. Also, it
increases the chances of secondary infertility as well as incidence
of the subsequent ectopic pregnancy [2]. The percentages of the
women with ectopic pregnancy go to an emergency department
with first trimester bleeding, pain, or both about (6 to 16%) [3].
Which is strongly associated with an increased incidence of pelvic
inflammatory disease [4]. Symptoms may present in both ruptured
and enraptured cases [5]. Ectopic pregnancy should be suspected
in any woman of reproductive age with these symptoms, especially
those who have risk factors for an extrauterine pregnancy [6]. The
diagnosis is usually made clinically, based upon results of the imaging
studies (ultrasound) and laboratory tests (hCG). The diagnosis can
also be made by observation of the ectopic gestation at surgery
or histopathological examination [7]. Transvaginal ultrasound
(TVUS) is the principle approach used for sonographic evaluation
of pregnancy of unknown location. TVUS allows for earlier and
more reliable detection of an intrauterine or ectopic pregnancy
(abdominal pregnancies are an exception) and for more reliable
detection of a fetal heartbeat compared with transabdominal
ultrasound (TAUS) [7]. A pseudosac can be seen in up to 20 percent
of women with an ectopic pregnancy [8]. An extraovarian adnexal
mass, seen in 89 to 100 percent of women with ectopic pregnancy,
is the most common.com finding in tubal pregnancy.
This is a descriptive, prospective hospital-based study .It was
conducted in Omdurman Maternity Hospital and Omdurman
New Hospital. Sudan, during the period from August 2014 to Jan 2015 all women diagnosed clinically and by ultrasound with
ectopic pregnancy attended study area were included in the study.
Time-frame sample size was be taken in a period of six months
from August 2014 to Jan 2015. Variables assessed were: sociodemographic
data, previous ectopic pregnancy, contraceptive usage,
tubal pathology and surgery, PID, clinical presentation, ultrasound
findings and intra-operative findings. Intra-operative findings were
correlated with clinical presentation, examination, and ultrasound
findings. Sensitivity and specificity was calculated. The data was
collected by direct interview using predesigned questionnaire.
Abdominal ultrasound, and/or vaginal ultrasound were done to
all the patients according to clinical presentation. Ultrasound was
done by senior obstetrician and radiologist. The data was analyzed
by computer program; statistical package for social science (SPPS),
results presented in tables and graphs. The test of significance was
be calculated by P value (0.05: 95% confidence). Written consent
was obtained from SMSB provided to the hospital administration.
Women consent was obtained verbally. Privacy of data collected
was considered.
For more Lupine Publishers Open Access Journals Please visit our website: https://lupinepublishers.us/
For more Gynecology Journals articles Please Click Here: https://lupinepublishers.com/gynecology-women-health-journal/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.